|
 This
is a topline introduction to some of the concepts and tools I have developed
or have in progress on the brand as promise. If you don't understand what
the Brand as Promise means then I suggest you click through to the New
Playing Field for Planners page and it will explain what I mean by
it and how this facet of the brand fits with the others.
The Brand
as promise needs broadening if you are working with disciplines other
than advertising. Even PR which largely works with the brand as promise
needs some amends. So here are some suggestions for moving beyond your
brand characters and onions and making your brand promise more compelling.
You may also find the page on Changing
Attitudes useful.
Here's the list so far:
 |
Brands as verbs not nouns
|
 |
Genres,
market categories and how to subvert them
|
 |
Generating bylines (multiple propositions)
|
 |
Defining
the emotional distance/focal length of the brand
|
 |
Brand Archetypes
|
 |
Writing screenplays for brands
|
Brands
as verbs not nouns
One of the main anomalies about brand theory is how curiously
static brands are. This is entirely because in conventional advertising
the brand character is a kind of freeze frame - advertising does not allow
for character development and most brand theorists have come from an advertising
background. But if you are engaged in almost any other form of marketing
communications brands can change their personality based on situation.
Therefore brand templates ought to be verbal, and brand values adverbs
rather than adjectives. Brands do stuff. Try generating a list of adverbs
which is different from competitors. You will find that it is much easier
for promotional, DM an new media teams to develop mechanics which are
on brand if you can give them behaviours instead of abstract characteristics.
Genres,
market categories
Market categories move together. Partly because marketing
people often stay inside their own market sectors for the duration of
their career so set out to produce work that fits the conventions of the
last few brands they have worked on. No wonder most communications for
cars is identical. Travel, booze, I could go on. What is particularly
interesting is that this is mostly unnecessary. The messages may be the
same but the communication genre could be entirely different. One of the
best ways to make your brand different is to identify the rules of the
convention - that is to say the genre. And then to either spoof that genre
or to use a completely different one. Of course the classic rebuff to
this is to say we have to use the standard genre otherwise people won't
know what it's for. And the classic rebuff to THAT is to say - if people
can't remember the brand then you are promoting the category not the brand
- and helping to sell your competitors' products. Check out the page on
category marketing as well.
Generating
bylines
A
proposition should contain a single thought. True. But how many propositions
can you have? This'll make the ad brethren shudder but one reason PR agencies
don't have a lot of use for planners is that they need lots of propositions.
They call them bylines. And one of the ways of getting coverage is to
give exclusives to individual publications. And planners who say there
is only one message and you can't give it exclusively to the Telegraph
aren't a lot of help. Of course you can have lots of propositions. You
just need to ensure that they tie back memorably and credibly to the brand.
In the End of Marketing as we know
it (and yes you can buy it from this site) Sergio Zyman recounts how he
made his agencies develop multiple propositions for Coca Cola and no they
weren't very happy about it. But he did it because he believed that different
audiences bought different propositions. So to unlock an entire mass market
you had to unlock it piece by piece. So let's have a little less serial
propositioning and get all your propositions out on the brief in one go.
Defining
the emotional distance/ the focal length of brands
We try to develop relationships between brands and consumers.
But most of the time we never define the emotional distance. Funny that.
Though it is critical to direct marketing and to mobile communications.
Because the more personal and the more direct the communication the more
intrusive that communication is if you get the focal length wrong. In
her 1997 APG paper on the launch of the Audi A3 Carol Lowe of Limbo went
into huge detail on the emotional distance they wanted to establish with
the Audi A3. It was completely different to that of the A4 or the A8.
And it's about the only example I've come across. So if your brand character
is a female character - work out if they're supposed to be iconic, talk
like a newsreader, bark at you like a drill inspector or come round for
a girly night in. It matters.
Brand
Archetypes
This 'un
has been rattling around for a while and a number of agencies are using
it on the quiet. Archetypes are unlike like stereotypes and we all use
those don't we dear readers? The difference is that archetypes are theoretically
universal - hardwired into the structure of our brains and endlessly reinforced
by culture. With sensitive adaption archetypes can leap cultural barriers
when stereotypes assuredly won't. And developing brand personas along
the lines of the lover, the judge, the cook as universals can be more
potent than Meg Ryan, Lord Denning and Jamie Oliver. The point about archetypes
is that we use them all the time and that we pay attention to them. So
brush the dust off your brand and check out which archetype it's closest
to.
Writing
screenplays for brands
Brands are verbs not nouns as I keep saying. And your
average brand doesn't do a lot. They're one trick ponies who never falter,
or at least never admit that they do. And after decades of this stuff
it's not surprising that we're a little bored with them. In Hollywood
you would never pitch a character without a storyline to bring them to
life. Every brand has an audience of interested onlookers who would follow
the storyline if one were provided. Some of the most successful brands
of recent times have been autobiographical - they have wrapped themselves
around their celebrity founders and we happily lap it up. There are at
least 2 implications for this. If you haven't got a celebrity founder
don't worry about it - write and disseminate stories about what your brand
is up to - allow your brand to feel discouraged from time to time (and
show it) explain how your brand is going to change and get better to overcome
the obstacles they face - it's what every blockbuster is based on. And
secondly even if you don't dare to do this then write the stories within
your teams as part of the development process and use them to think up
your promotional plans and your web programming - storylines make better
briefing tools than static creative briefs because they show how the brand
goes about it's business. And if you want to know any more then have a
look at Brand
Narratives which is a workshop I offer on the subject.
|